An article from DLA Piper on 25 August says that many non-US-manufactured products are still trapped under the jurisdiction of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).  Whether or not foreign-made products incorporating US-origin content or manufactured from US-origin technology, machines or plants is now a primary consideration for major international technology and telecommunications companies because of the expansion of export prohibitions over the last decade.  The article examines how a non-US-made product, but incorporating US-origin components or technology, can escape the technical jurisdiction of the EAR.  It looks at the exceptions, including the de minimis rule, what is “incorporated” and what is not and is “controlled”.


Any modest contributions for my time and ongoing expenses are welcomed!  I have a page where you can do so, and where one-off contributions start as low as $3, at https://www.buymeacoffee.com/KoIvM842y

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: