SFO HAS MARKED THE TENTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BRIBERY ACT 2010 COMING INTO FORCE WITH ITS TENTH DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT

An article from Eversheds Sutherland on 14 July was concerned with the Amec Foster Wheeler Energy Limited DPA.  It asks what does this DPA tell us about the SFO’s expectations on self-reporting?  It also asked what must corporate organisations do in order to be sufficiently co-operative to qualify for a DPA?  How is the SFO’s approach to the calculation of the financial penalty elements of DPA changing, and what do the Courts think of these changes?  Furthermore, it asks, in which circumstances will external monitors be appointed, and what about individuals?

https://www.eversheds-sutherland.com/global/en/what/articles/index.page?ArticleID=en/Fraud_and_financial_crime/Power_of_ten_Serious_Fraud_Office

 

 

 

Any modest contributions for my time and ongoing expenses are welcomed!  I have a page where you can do so, and where contributions start as low as $3, at https://www.buymeacoffee.com/KoIvM842y

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s