On 9 December, Addleshaw & Goddard LLP published an article about a recent Court of Appeal judgment which contains useful guidance on the use and purpose of search orders. If a search order is obtained, the search must be undertaken carefully, with appropriate safeguards, and must go no further than what the order permits. Otherwise, there is a risk that a court will find the Claimant to have breached the search order and the Defendant may look to have the claim struck out accordingly. It makes clear that an order for inspection is distinct, will require separate justifications and must be obtained prior to the inspection of documents found during the search order.  The judgment made clear that the purpose of the search order involved was the preservation of evidence and, whilst the search order authorised inspection of the documents, it only authorised inspection during the course of the search, not subsequently, and only for the purposes of the search.

I had omitted the following link (as it did not seem to generate much interest!), but it seemed time to add it again and say that, if you would like to make a (polite) gesture and help me with my removal and computer costs, I have a page at

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s