On 7 July, Mayer Brown published an article saying that the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the new test for dishonesty that is now applied in civil cases in England and Wales applies equally in criminal cases. It says that there is now no subjective element and no longer will a defendant be able to argue their innocence because they did not realise their actions were dishonest. This clarification has implications for criminal cases of serious fraud, where successful prosecutions of individuals have been thin on the ground. The article says that the most immediate effect of the judgment is that it makes each case much more fact-specific than was the case with the previous Ghosh test. Only time will tell whether this will result in an increase in successful prosecutions of individuals in cases of complex fraud.


If you would like to say thanks by making a small contribution, in case I need to upgrade or replace my computers and other paraphernalia, I have a page at “Buy me a Coffee” –

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s