On 28 June, the Brookings Institute in the US launched a framework called “TAP-Plus” which highlights specific factors that need to be considered in addition to the traditional focus on the adoption of transparency, accountability, and participation (TAP) measures. Brookings says that the extractive industries like oil, gas, and mining are particularly prone to the corruption risks that undermine good governance. Given the complexity of these governance challenges, it asks, can natural resource corruption be reduced, or even eliminated?  It says that, the TAP-Plus approach hypothesises that 3 elements require particular attention for scaled-up impact

  • inter­ventions that address the implementation gap within TAP interventions;
  • consideration of contextual factors in design of realistic TAP programs; and
  • inclusion of complementary measures—beyond the traditional TAP field—which interact with TAP interventions and may have a significant impact in preventing or reducing corruption and improve sus­tainable development outcomes.

A paper published by Brookings explains these key elements.





If you would like to say thanks by making a small contribution, in case I need to upgrade or replace my computers and other paraphernalia, I have a page at




Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s