An article from Paul Hastings on 23 June commented on the recent US Supreme Court decision that the SEC had authority to seek disgorgement from defendants in a federal action. In an 8-1 decision, the Court held that the SEC does have statutory authority to seek disgorgement as equitable relief. However, that authority is not without limitations, and the decision raises a number of questions regarding the application of that authority. The article considers the underlying case, and the implications of the decision going forward.  One implicatiuon the article suggests will be the increasing attractiveness of using the SEC administrative process to resolve ongoing investigations going forward, allowing the SEC to take the position that the Supreme Court decision does not therefore apply.


If you would like to say thanks by making a small contribution, in case I need to upgrade or replace my computers and other paraphernalia, I have a page at



Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s