TITLE III OF THE HELMS-BURTON ACT CASES SUFFER THEIR FIRST SIGNIFICANT SETBACK

On 11 June, Lawfare explained that Title III of the Act (only activated last year), allows US nationals to sue persons and entities that “traffic” in property confiscated by the Cuban government, with “traffic” being defined expansively to include not only engaging “in a commercial activity using or otherwise benefiting from confiscated property” but also profiting from any trafficking done by anyone else. In its first year since being activated 26 suits were filed against purported traffickers, a smaller number than many experts anticipated.  The article now notes that a recent court decision held that plaintiffs may bring an action under Title III only if they acquired ownership of their claim to confiscated property in Cuba before 12 March 1996 (i.e. when the Act was passed).  The court’s holding, if followed by other courts, could significantly reduce the number of Title III lawsuits.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/suits-under-title-iii-helms-burton-act-suffer-their-first-significant-setback

 

If you would like to say thanks by making a small contribution, in case I need to upgrade or replace my computers and other paraphernalia, I have a page at https://www.buymeacoffee.com/KoIvM842y

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s