On 27 April, the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies announced a new study, dated 13 March, which aims to examine why most governments appear to attach less importance to countering proliferation finance than they do to countering money laundering or terrorist financing. It finds that there are presently significant gaps in CPF implementation at the national level, with resulting implications for private sector compliance. One key finding is said to be that most governments do not address the issue of proliferation finance as distinct from other forms of financial crime, such as terrorist financing or money laundering.  It identifies practical opportunities for improved financial sector implementation of counterproliferation finance controls.


If you’d like to help to contribute to the cost of the new laptop and desktop I have had to acquire, now that I am 5,000 miles away from my originals –

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: