An article in the Law Society Gazette on 6 April was concerned with discussing the February report from the British Institute of International and Comparative Law – A UK Failure to Prevent Mechanism for Corporate Human Rights Harms – describing its vision of the Institute for how the “failure to prevent” model could operate to punish companies deemed responsible for human rights abuses in their supply chain.  The report claims that this would provide legal certainty regarding the human rights obligations that companies face, and encourage them to take steps to guard against abuses in their supply chain.  The article discusses practical issues, such as human rights abuses being defined differently by different countries.  The article proposes, as an alternative, modelling any new legislation on section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015, as opposed to section 7 of the Bribery Act, with an independent human rights commissioner to oversee enforcement.


If you’d like to help to contribute to that (badly needed, but now ordered) new laptop or, even better, the new desktop said to be on its way, to replace the one now 5,000 miles away –

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s