On 19th March, the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force released its 4th round mutual evaluation report on the Cayman Islands. It highlights local efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, but it said gaps in resources at the financial crime unit, as well as, limited legislative oversight have left the country’s financial services sector open to abuse. The report mentions that, in 2015, the Cayman Islands concluded its first AML/CFT National Risk Assessment (NRA). However, it says that the NRA did not include an assessment of legal persons or arrangements, nor did it conduct sufficient analysis of the risks present in parts of the financial sector not subject to supervision (e.g. lawyers and excluded persons under the Securities Investment Business Law (SIBL). Further, the assessment did not fully address the international components of risk faced by the jurisdiction as a significant international financial centre or provide evidence that sufficient analysis was conducted with respect to the jurisdiction’s TF risks. This has resulted in major deficiencies that have inhibited the jurisdiction’s ability to analyse and understand its risks.
https://cayman27.ky/2019/03/cfatf-ci-evaluation-report-points-to-gaps-in-local-resources-legislation/
https://cayman27.ky/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2019/03/cfatf-4meval-Cayman-Islands.pdf
The Cayman Compass reported on 18th March that the Government has responded to what appears to be a damning evaluation of the effectiveness of Cayman’s AML framework by launching an action plan that aims to address any deficiencies within a year. The Premier announced the appointment of a dedicated task force, made up of several government agencies, to oversee the implementation of a “comprehensive action plan”. Actions it says are required by the CFATF report include that information on the directors of Cayman companies and limited liability companies should be publicly available. In addition, government should introduce provisions that will allow the General Registry to share information with other competent authorities. Meanwhile, fines for failure to maintain accurate beneficial ownership registers should be increased. The fact that partnerships are not subject to Cayman’s beneficial ownership regime is incompatible with the evaluation report’s requirements, and competent authorities should have the power to access beneficial ownership information for partnerships, the CFATF said.
https://www.caymancompass.com/2019/03/18/government-new-anti-money-laundering-plan-under-way/
https://www.internationalinvestment.net/news/4001404/cayman-amends-money-laundering-rules
https://www.caymancompass.com/2019/03/19/money-laundering-report-finds-major-deficiencies-in-cayman/
The Cayman Government has issued a press release in response to the report –
https://cayman27.ky/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2019/03/Cayman-Islands-committed-to-CFATF-progress-v2.docx

