MONEY LAUNDERING AND SPECIFIC INTENT CAN BE DIFFICULT TO PROVE

The National Law Review in the US on 1st October carried an article about a recent court case in Virginia – United States v. Millender.  This involved a seemingly straightforward alleged fraud and money laundering scheme reminds us that money laundering charges still require the government to establish elements which can be difficult to prove, including, importantly, specific intent.  The case involved an alleged investment fraud scheme charged against a husband and wife and their associate – Terry and Brenda Millender, the founder and pastor of the “First Lady” of the Victorious Life Church.  Despite jury guilty verdicts, the court found at least as to some counts that there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law of knowledge and specific intent.  The court overturned the wife’s conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering because “the evidence was insufficient to establish that she knew the funds involved in the . . . transactions represented the proceeds from some form of unlawful activity”, hence lacking the mental intent (mens rea) for conviction.

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/money-laundering-and-specific-intent-can-be-difficult-to-prove

Author: raytodd2017

Chartered Legal Executive and former senior manager with Isle of Man Customs and Excise, where I was (amongst other things) Sanctions Officer (for UN/EU sanctions), Export Licensing Officer and Manager of the Legal-Library & Collectorate Support Section

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s